Norwegiannationalist (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

free speech is extremly important and why do u think the west evolved inot what it is today. 1000 years ago the church decided what people should think and do and Europe was backward, but gradualy people got more rigths and began to think for themselves and this lead to inventions like guns. If u shut peoples mouth u will allways remain poor thats a fact it has happend over and over again and there is no difference between Franco and the mullah regime in iran on that mather

Most1988 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

ok but what if you say fuck science. and publish it so people see it and some follow and agree. you start explaining why we dont need science and how its evil. shouldnt you be stopped? come on now we cant just be allowed to say fuck islam, fuck christianity, fuck jews, fuck atheists or any religion or race in public. do what u want in private. but u shouldnt publish it. i mean should you be allowed to say fuck niggers? its free of speach right?

wildheartmuse (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Imagine no religion, no, really, just try to imagin....less hate, more reason to work on understanding each other, no b.s about an afterlife so more determination to make this one the best it could be.Imagine no religion, wow, wouldn't that be great.

Norwegiannationalist (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

free speech means that u can say fuck islam without fearing for ur life and beeing protected by the law

Most1988 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

free speach? what if i make up lies about u and publish it, would you care or no? its free speach, thats what i think of you why would u care?

mikeandlaurie1979 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Thank you pat. burn all the fucking religious pieces of shit.

CAFoster58 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

We should wonder why he his not willing to debate the claim that he has made.

CAFoster58 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"ExposingCondell2" makes a claim that there has been no support when talking about modern historiographic methods and the Gospel of Luke. But I have challenged "ExposingCondell2" to debate that very thing, and he has refused.

CAFoster58 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

My point, here, is that Condell's lack of attention to posted comments and emails is reasonable, and Josiah's complaints that they are not read is not reasonable, under the circumstances. It constitutes a petty complaint. The hypocrisy is in Josiah's complaint when one considers that he (Josiah) likewise does not generally respond to criticisms of his comments.

CAFoster58 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

No reasonable person would expect the channel operator, if that is the correct term, to respond to a fraction of those comments, let alone all of them, especially when one considers that the number of channel comments must be weighed with respect to the quality and usefulness of them. This is YouTube, after all, and so we can easily dismiss most of the comments as nonsensical and not worthy of time to rebut